Connect with us

Local News

The Democratic rebuttal: Read Sen. Elissa Slotkin’s response to President Trump

Published

on

The Democratic rebuttal to President Donald Trump’s speech before Congress came from Sen. Elissa Slotkin, a first-term senator from Michigan. She spoke for about 11 minutes.

Here is a transcript of her remarks as prepared for delivery:

Hi everyone. I’m Elissa Slotkin. I’m honored to have the opportunity to speak tonight. It’s late — so I promise to be a lot shorter than what you just watched.

I won’t take it personally if you’ve never heard of me. I’m the new senator from the great state of Michigan, where I grew up. I’ve been in public service my entire life, because I happened to be in New York City on 9/11 when the twin towers came down. Before the smoke cleared, I knew I wanted a life in national security.

I was recruited by the CIA and did three tours in Iraq, alongside the military. In between, I worked at the White House under President Bush and President Obama, two very different leaders who both believed that America is exceptional.

You can find that same sense of patriotism here in Wyandotte, Michigan, where I am tonight. It’s a working-class town just south of Detroit. President Trump and I both won here in November. It might not seem like it, but plenty of places like this still exist all across the United States – places where people believe that if you work hard, and play by the rules, you should do well and your kids do better.

It reminds me of how I grew up. My dad was a lifelong Republican, my mom a lifelong Democrat. But it was never a big deal. Because we had shared values that were bigger than any one party.

We just went through another fraught election season. Americans made it clear that prices are too high and that government needs to be more responsive to their needs. America wants change. But there is a responsible way to make change, and a reckless way. And, we can make that change without forgetting who we are as a country, and as a democracy.

So that’s what I’m going to lay out tonight.

Because whether you’re in Wyandotte or Wichita, most Americans share three core beliefs: That the Middle Class is the engine of our country. That strong national security protects us from harm. And that our democracy, no matter how messy, is unparalleled and worth fighting for.

Let’s start with the economy.

Michigan literally invented the Middle Class: the revolutionary idea that you could work at an auto plant and afford the car you were building. That’s the American Dream. And in order to expand and protect the Middle Class, we have to do a few, basic things:

We need to bring down the price of things we spend the most money on: Groceries. Housing. Healthcare. Your car.

We need to make more things in America with good-paying, union jobs — and bring our supply chains back home from places like China.

We need to give American businesses the certainty they need to invest and create the jobs of the future.

And we need a tax system that’s fair for people who don’t happen to make a billion dollars.

Look, President Trump talked a big game on the economy, but it’s always important to read the fine print. So: do his plans actually help Americans get ahead?

Not even close.

President Trump is trying to deliver an unprecedented giveaway to his billionaire friends. He’s on the hunt to find trillions of dollars to pass along to the wealthiest in America. And to do that, he’s going to make you pay in every part of your life.

Grocery and home prices are going up, not down — and he hasn’t laid out a credible plan to deal with either.

His tariffs on allies like Canada will raise prices on energy, lumber, cars — and start a trade war that will hurt manufacturing and farmers.

Your premiums and prescriptions will cost more because the math on his proposals doesn’t work without going after your health care.

Meanwhile, for those keeping score, the national debt is going up, not down. And if he’s not careful, he could walk us right into a recession.

And one more thing: In order to pay for his plan, he could very well come after your retirement – the Social Security, Medicare, and VA benefits you worked your whole life to earn. The President claims he won’t, but Elon Musk just called Social Security “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.”

While we’re on the subject of Elon Musk, is there anyone in America who is comfortable with him and his gang of 20-year-olds using their own computer servers to poke through your tax returns, your health information, and your bank accounts? No oversight. No protections against cyber-attack. No guardrails on what they do with your private data.

We need more efficient government. You want to cut waste, I’ll help you do it. But change doesn’t need to be chaotic or make us less safe.

The mindless firing of people who work to protect our nuclear weapons, keep our planes from crashing, and conduct the research that finds the cure for cancer — only to re-hire them two days later? No CEO in America could do that without being summarily fired.

OK, so we’ve talked about our economic security. How about national security?

Let’s start with the border. As someone who spent my whole career protecting our homeland, every country deserves to know who and what is coming across its border. Period. Democrats and Republicans should all be for that.

But securing the border without actually fixing our broken immigration system is dealing with the symptom not the disease. America is a nation of immigrants. We need a functional system, keyed to the needs of our economy, that allows vetted people to come and work here legally. So I look forward to the President’s plan on that.

Because here’s the thing: Today’s world is deeply interconnected. Migration, cyber threats, AI, environmental destruction, terrorism — one nation cannot face these issues alone. We need friends in all corners — and our safety depends on it.

President Trump loves to promise “peace through strength.” That’s actually a line he stole from Ronald Reagan. But let me tell you, after the spectacle that just took place in the Oval Office last week, Reagan must be rolling over in his grave. We all want an end to the war in Ukraine, but Reagan understood that true strength required America to combine our military and economic might with moral clarity.

And that scene in the Oval Office wasn’t just a bad episode of reality TV. It summed up Trump’s whole approach to the world. He believes in cozying up to dictators like Vladimir Putin and kicking our friends, like Canada, in the teeth. He sees American leadership as merely a series of real estate transactions.

As a Cold War kid, I’m thankful it was Reagan and not Trump in office in the 1980s. Trump would have lost us the Cold War.

Donald Trump’s actions suggest that, in his heart, he doesn’t believe we are an exceptional nation. He clearly doesn’t think we should lead the world.

Look, America’s not perfect. But I stand with most Americans who believe we are still exceptional. Unparalleled. And I would rather have American leadership over Chinese or Russian leadership any day of the week.

Because for generations, America has offered something better.

Our security and our prosperity, yes. But our democracy, our very system of government, has been the aspiration of the world. And right now, it’s at risk.

It’s at risk when a president decides he can pick and choose what rules he wants to follow, when he ignores court orders or the Constitution itself, or when elected leaders stand idly by and just let it happen.

But it’s also at risk when the President pits Americans against each other, when he demonizes those who are different, and tells certain people they shouldn’t be included.

Because America is not just a patch of land between two oceans. We are more than that. Generations have fought and died to secure the fundamental rights that define us. Those rights and the fight for them make us who we are.

We are a nation of strivers. Risk-takers. Innovators. And we are never satisfied.

That is America’s superpower.

And look, I’ve lived and worked in many countries. I’ve seen democracies flicker out. I’ve seen what life is like when a government is rigged. You can’t open a business without paying off a corrupt official. You can’t criticize the guys in charge without getting a knock at the door in the middle of the night.

So as much as we need to make our government more responsive to our lives today, don’t for one moment fool yourself that democracy isn’t precious and worth saving.

But how do we actually do that? I know a lot of you have been asking that question.

First, don’t tune out. It’s easy to be exhausted, but America needs you now more than ever. If previous generations had not fought for democracy, where would we be today?

Second, hold your elected officials, including me, accountable. Watch how they’re voting. Go to town halls and demand they take action. That’s as American as apple pie.

Three, organize. Pick just one issue you’re passionate about — and engage. And doom scrolling doesn’t count. Join a group that cares about your issue, and act. And if you can’t find one, start one.

Some of the most important movements in our history have come from the bottom up.

In closing, we all know that our country is going through something right now. We’re not sure what the next day is going to hold, let alone the next decade.

But this isn’t the first time we’ve experienced significant and tumultuous change as a country. I’m a student of history, and we’ve gone through periods of political instability before. And ultimately, we’ve chosen to keep changing this country for the better.

But every single time, we’ve only gotten through those moments because of two things: Engaged citizens and principled leaders.

Engaged citizens who do a little bit more than they’re used to doing to fight for the things they care about. And principled leaders who are ready to receive the ball and do something about it.

So thank you tonight for caring about your country. Just by watching, you qualify as engaged citizens. And I promise that I, and my fellow Democrats, will do everything in our power to be the principled leaders that you deserve.

Goodnight everyone.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Local News

Santa Anita horse racing consensus picks for Monday, March 17, 2025

Published

on

The consensus box of Santa Anita horse racing picks comes from handicappers Bob Mieszerski, Eddie Wilson, Kevin Modesti and Mark Ratzky. Here are the picks for thoroughbred races on Monday, March 17, 2025.

Trouble viewing on mobile device? See consensus picks

Enjoy the consensus horse racing picks online? Subscribe

Sign up for Ponies Express newsletter and get the latest news and tips on wagers for weekend Horse Racing at Santa Anita and other Southern California tracks in your inbox. Subscribe here.

 

 

Continue Reading

Local News

Ducks can’t overcome defensive blues in loss to St. Louis

Published

on

ST. LOUIS — Brayden Schenn and Pavel Buchnevich each scored in the first 90 seconds, and the St. Louis Blues beat the Anaheim Ducks 7-2 on Sunday night.

Dylan Holloway and Jake Neighbours each had a goal and an assist, and Pavel Buchnevich, Radek Faksa, Mathieu Joseph and Oskar Sundqvist also scored for St. Louis. Jordan Kyrou had three assists, and Justin Faulk had two.

Jordan Binnington made 22 saves as the Blues won for the eighth time in 11 games (8-2-1) to pull into a tie with Vancouver for the second wild card in the Western Conference.

Cutter Gauthier had a goal and an assist, Nikita Nesterenko also scored and Mason McTavish had two assists for the Ducks, who lost for the fifth time in seven games. Lukas Dostal gave up five goals on 14 shots over the first two periods, and Ville Husso stopped 10 of the 12 shots he faced in the third.

Schenn scored his 16th goal of the season 41 seconds into the game, and Buchnevich added his 14th goal just 49 seconds later to give St. Louis an early 2-0 lead.

Schenn, honored by the Blues for playing in his 1,000th career game earlier this month, also fought Ducks defenseman Jacob Trouba late in the first, earning a major for fighting and a minor for unsportsmanlike conduct.

The start of the game was pushed back two hours after St. Louis was forced to spend Saturday night in St. Paul after playing Minnesota due to a mechanical issue with the team’s plane.

Takeaways

Ducks: Anaheim lost for the eighth time in 12 games (4-7-1) to fall eight points out of the second wild card in the Western Conference.

Blues: St. Louis attacked early and didn’t allow Anaheim to generate many scoring threats.

Key moment

Binnington stopped Trevor Zegras on a breakaway opportunity that would have cut Anaheim’s deficit to 3-2 in the second period 3:31 after Gauthier got the Ducks on the scoreboard.

Key stat

St. Louis went 3 for 4 on the power play, 3 for 3 on the penalty-kill and scored a short-handed goal.

Up next

Ducks visit Dallas on Tuesday, and Blues play at Nashville.

Continue Reading

Local News

Swanson: USC women’s basketball nets disrespectful No. 1 seed

Published

on

LOS ANGELES — It was as though the NCAA Women’s Basketball Selection Committee saw what USC planned to wear to Sunday’s Selection celebration at Galen Center – Nike T-shirts that read: “NOTHING EASY” – and took it literally.

Because when Trojans coach Lindsay Gottlieb saw what the committee drew up for her team, you better believe she took that personally.

JuJu Watkins and USC garnered a No. 1 seed, as everyone expected, starting in the first round Saturday with No. 16 UNC Greensboro and potentially bound for the Spokane Regional for the Sweet 16 and Elite Eight.

But what irked Gottlieb, and rightly so, was that out of the four No. 1 seeds, the Trojans fell to the fourth.

Ahead of them, No. 1 overall seed UCLA, “as they should be,” Gottlieb stressed.

But the Bruins were immediately followed by South Carolina and Texas, even though USC beat UCLA two of three times this season and South Carolina lost to the Bruins 77-62.

And even though South Carolina lost by 29 points to UConn, which USC beat in a non-conference showdown in Connecticut.

And even though Texas, like USC, lost to Notre Dame and also lost to South Carolina twice.

How USC slipped behind both of those teams is a mystery.

“I don’t understand people who make decisions in women’s basketball and why they do what they do, none of it makes sense to me,” said Gottlieb, who wasn’t just perplexed but admittedly and surprisingly agitated – and speaking for a whole lot of us.

Any of us who looked at the bracket and immediately saw, among whatever other bracket-building shenanigans got revealed, a particularly heinous affront to women’s basketball’s growing audience.

Sitting at No. 2 in USC’s corner of the bracket: UConn.

That means we’re going to lose either Watkins, everyone’s national player of the year, or Paige Bueckers, one of the game’s biggest and most-beloved stars and presumptive No. 1 pick in the next WNBA Draft, before the Final Four.

One of the two biggest stars in the game is guaranteed to go home before the college game’s grandest stage. Good people on the committee, what are you doing?!

And why? UConn is 31-3, and the Huskies’ only three losses came against USC (28-3), as well as championship contender Notre Dame and their historic rival, Tennessee. They don’t deserve possibly to be meeting the Trojans so early, either.

Women’s basketball’s decision-makers haven’t done something so dumb, well, since last year.

Remember when they slotted a potential rematch of the previous season’s historic national championship – Caitlin Clark and Iowa vs. Angel Reese and LSU – in the Elite Eight … and that was after LSU got past UCLA, then a dangerous No. 2 seed?

“That, Gottlieb said, “was a little wild too.”

Because, as she asked: “Wouldn’t you think they’d want the best television ratings in Tampa at the Final Four?”

It was a rhetorical question, but I’ll answer it anyway: Yes! Yes, we sure would! Especially when that’s what is merited.

“I never thought I’d be a one seed and feel disrespected, I just thought there would be very little chance that we’d be the No. 4 overall No. 1,” said Gottlieb, who didn’t hold back, wavering between peeved and diplomatic, the proverbial angel and devil on her shoulders going at it.

“This is not an arrogance of any kind, there’s a lot of really good teams,” she said, with a nod to a field that doesn’t feature a single undefeated or even a one-loss team for just the second time in 19 years. “And you have to play the first game in front of you and earn your way from there.”

But, really: “This was not on my bingo card.”

Will the draw fuel her team? Should we be pitying UNC Greensboro and probably whoever emerges from No. 8 Cal vs. No. 9 Mississippi State for the spite-sharpened USC buzzsaw they’re about to meet? “If there’s a little extra motivation for a team that’s already a No. 1 seed,” Gottlieb said, “we’re gonna have it.”

Or is could it cost the Trojans? Cut them down prematurely? Either in an Elite Eight game that should be a Final Four game, or earlier in the especially thorny thicket that’s facing them as the lowest top seed? Could just feeling slighted slice into their focus?

After all, as bracketologist Charlie Creme told ESPN’s audience Sunday: UConn will have an experience advantage if they do meet again: “If you’re USC, you’re still a little bit new to this game.”

That statement got the 1,000 fans who showed up at Galen Center on Sunday to cheer their Trojans booing.

And it drew a wry smile from Watkins, who, of course, chose to stay home in L.A. and come to USC to change the narrative around women’s basketball at the school.

I won’t try to predict the response from Gottlieb’s team, but it felt noteworthy that her players didn’t explode in cheers and dance the way most teams on the Selection Show broadcast did. Instead they registered their fate with business-like expressions, wearing game faces already, Mamba-like.

“People have their own opinions,” Watkins said. “We know what we’re capable of.”

Continue Reading

Trending